Why on earth would it be better to get people to change content paths on an obscure menu when it seemed to be working perfectly well before. Maybe I am not seeing the big picture here, but either I'm missing something here, or whilst the system is working as intended, then it is poorly designed.
I could then add it and if I then moved it back, then I could hopefully use the browse function to locate it as you do when you have a kissing library. Then as the library was fairly small I copied it to the same subfolder as the one where the Art Vista library that was detected earlier. I know, I thought, I'll add the folder to the database in Kontakt. Well, I changed the path of the content folder in Native Access to where this library resided - I hope it would lick it up like Art Vista - but no dice so I changed it back. Typing in the serial number into the Native Access dialog that comes up when you click add library - it says the code is not valid. However, one of my (admittedly minor) Sonokinetic instruments wasn't picked up as I had put it in a subfolder. It must have been scanning one of the folders that hold the VI's I thought. That's odd, I thought, haven't seen that before - however I clicked on add and it added the library just fine. What is odd that when I tried to add the last couple of libraries, Native Access came up and detected I hadn't installed an Art Vista library in the folder where I keep most of my non-NI VI's. So I'm waiting for the delivery when I saw the update - had a quick check on VI-Control and didn't see any issues, so I updated. However, I have an internal SSD card for my Mac Pro coming today to put on HWO Diamond and my favourite Kontakt Libraries. I've been moving my libraries over to a Slave machine running VE Pro 6, and I had nearly finished.
I cannot understand why anyone at NI would imagine this is a good idea.
0 kommentar(er)
